If you are in Thailand for the first time, whether for a few days
visit or to work for a number of years, some understanding of the
character of the average Thai people will help prevent you from
some of the expected culture shocks and make your stay a most enjoyable
experience.
Perhaps the most prominent feature of the character of the Thai
people is their natural inclination to smile.
You may have learned of Thailand as the "Land of Smiles"
epithet frequently used in the tourism promotion campaigns of this
country in recent years.
You may have no doubt about the truth contained in the statement,
since it would boomerang if it were not true. But you may wonder
why this is so.
The most important influence the Thai people have received in
their character formation has been the teachings of Buddhism,
which emphasize on the doctrine of causality. They take things
easy because they believe that everything in life is the result
of some action in the past, and that what will happen will happen.
They are kind to strangers because they believe that good deeds
will bring rewards to the doer in a future life. They are tolerant
of evils because they believe that the evil-doer will be punished
without their intervention In short, they are always cheerful
no matter whether in success or in adversity.
Two
other factors contributing to their happy-go-lucky outlook on
life are the agricultural society and the favorable natural environment
in which they have lived in the larger part of their history.
Living in the countryside where there is plenty of fertile land
and plenty of rainfall and where there is little competition,
it is easy for them to feel content. Except in times of war, mostly
in the form of foreign invasions the Thai people have lived in
their motherland for centuries in happiness and contentment.
These
same factors and influences have also helped is another significant
trait of the Thai nation - their love of peace. This is shown
in their exceptional ability to co-exist with people of different
ethnic groups, different religions, different political views
and different social classes. In Thai history, there have been
no religious wars. When Europeans first came to Thailand in the
17th century, they were allowed to preach Christianity. The Thai
Buddhists and Muslims have lived harmoniously in the South. There
have been wars with neighboring countries, but ethnic minorities
within the country who have posed no threat to national security
have never been oppressed or discriminated against. Immigrants
from China and India, for example, have been able to get rich
without incurring envy or hatred.
Thailand is notorious for its frequent coups d'etat in its modern
history. But most of them were bloodless. And only one of the
unsuccessful coup leaders got the capital punishment, and that
was not merely because he had staged a coup and failed, but because
he had shot a loyal general to death first. And when King Chulalongkorn
ordered the emancipation of slaves in 1905, no violence was reported
throughout the country, not to mention a civil war like that in
the United States.
But
all this does not mean that the Thai people will allow themselves
to be trodden upon. There is always a limit to their tolerance.
That was why the Burmese invaders were expelled by King Naresuan
in 1584 and again by King Taksin in 1767. Also, in 1688. Constantine
Phaulkon, a Greek sailor turned powerful minister in the Siamese
court, was decapitated when he was alleged to have plotted to
convert a Siamese prince to Roman Catholism and to install him
to the throne. Again, in 1945, several ethnic Chinese in Bangkok
Chinatown were killed by the police when they showed an excess
of enthusiasm in celebrating China's triumph over Japan in World
War II, in which the Thai government sided with Japan. The minor
discord caused by the incident was soon healed after King Rama
VIII paid a visit to Chinatown in May 1946 jointly with his younger
brother, Prince Bhumibol, now King Rama IX.
The Thai people's love of peace is also reflected in their tendency
to compromise and their reluctance to disturb others. It was due
to King Bhumibol's advice to compromise that both the student
uprising in 1973 and the bloodshed in May 1991 came to a peaceful
end without resulting in more deaths or endless reprisals. More
than a century ago when Western colonialism spread to Asia, it
was also due partly to King Chulalongkorn's willingness to make
concessions that Siam did not suffer the same fate as her neighbors.
|